Over 58620

Intelligent Politics

"Intelligent" Design -



THE INTELLIGENT CHOICE - Isn't that a contradiction?

Dana Loesch -

Diminishing Returns -

Google his name for a good laugh -

TAGS: rick santorum intelligent design denier
Rating: 4.38/5

More politifakes by rebeccaolsen

rebeccaolsen - June 11, 2015, 5:12 pm
fauxnews - June 11, 2015, 5:11 pm
*tag* Know your roll, Rebecca X-D www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlYRJOW-JD4
rebeccaolsen - June 11, 2015, 5:09 pm
*tag* D'amn right, Hulkster. Tag-team wrestling FTW! :)
fauxnews - June 11, 2015, 5:06 pm
*tag* What she said. X-D
rebeccaolsen - June 11, 2015, 4:49 pm
Uh, thank you? lol Don't ever change, jobber. WE like you just the way you are. :)
rebeccaolsen - June 11, 2015, 4:48 pm
...Your latest conspiracy theory is we're all part of a tag team federation of libs trying to throw you out of the ring.But every Pro-Wrestling soap opera needs its heel.In your quest to takeout Faux (e.g's#77067-#77069),you volunteered to be our "jobber"
rebeccaolsen - June 11, 2015, 4:40 pm
As for the rest,changing your composure now and your tactics dont erase or cover up your dozens of prior rageful comments,as much as you wish you could.The internet's nice that way,hun :) It was clear u blew your top over this site,and ruled by your anger
rebeccaolsen - June 11, 2015, 4:34 pm
Speaking of falsehoods - Meltdowns like #76630 and #76712 (and many like them) are proof against your Point Three.
rebeccaolsen - June 11, 2015, 4:32 pm
Speaking of falsehoods - Comments like #76846, and #76876 (and many like them) are proof against your Point Two.
rebeccaolsen - June 11, 2015, 4:30 pm
Speaking of falsehoods - Your emotional angry meltdown in #76992 is proof against your Point One.
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 11, 2015, 4:24 pm
It's a cheap ploy to use the false but.tons claim to distract from an argument, but commonly used by people here who can't put up a sound argument.
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 11, 2015, 4:22 pm
pushed on this site. I don't take it seriously enough to allow that to happen.
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 11, 2015, 4:22 pm
There are a few falsehoods in your comment: 1. I don't hate science, I use science to dispel bogus arguments where people like you claim theories are anything other than conjecture. 2. I don't troll anyone, I get trolled 3. My but.tons have never been
fauxnews - June 11, 2015, 3:38 pm
cheers, EM. Have a good one X-D
fauxnews - June 11, 2015, 3:38 pm
And,again,how does that(or really, anything you’ve been saying)change anything,or the fact that you blew it?LOL You hate science and use it to troll others you dont like.People like me see through it ;-) SO WHAT if that pushes your bu.ttons? Not my prob
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 11, 2015, 2:40 pm
He represents everything that is wrong with the human race, in my opinion.
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 11, 2015, 2:35 pm
cheers, fauxnews. Have a good one ;-)
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 11, 2015, 2:35 pm
propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 11, 2015, 2:34 pm
See your comments #76594, #76587, #76573, #76570 where you continuously called MMCC a theory. Dictionary definition of theory: a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established
fauxnews - June 11, 2015, 1:17 pm
Cheers Zeitguy. Have a good one, mate. ;-)
fauxnews - June 11, 2015, 1:17 pm
What's funny, Zeit, is that because deniers are unable to understand the science,they think it invalidates it.What it does validate,however,is their inability(unwillingness?)to expand the understanding of the planet they live on (bubble they live in?) :-)
Zeitguy - June 11, 2015, 12:08 pm
And the whole frothy mix thing is very disconcerting. :)
Zeitguy - June 11, 2015, 12:00 pm
And BTW Rick Santorum is a complete imbecile and represents everything that is wrong with the Republican Party. (But that is just an opinion.)
Zeitguy - June 11, 2015, 11:38 am
I'm guessing you are confusing scientific theory with conjecture. A commin ploy used to deny that which is non conforming to your preconceived conceptions.
MMessEnnBeeCee - June 11, 2015, 11:24 am
Are you saying that it's no longer a theory?
Zeitguy - June 11, 2015, 11:17 am
The one side of the overwhelming scientific community is settled. Idiot politicians and gullible pundits act like there still is a debate.
ipaprime - June 11, 2015, 9:51 am
I said there is no proof on either side. But it seems one side considers the science "settled". HMM where have we heard that refrain from?
guest818 - June 10, 2015, 11:14 am
I just caught your title - "Google his name for a good laugh" I looked up the definition of his name and it is indeed funny (i.e. joke) ^_^
Zeitguy - June 10, 2015, 9:57 am
Ah the tired argument of no proof of existence. The fall back illogical discourse when there is no evidence. I believe in Thor, prove me wrong.
ipaprime - June 10, 2015, 9:15 am
There is no "proof" against or for intelligent design just opinions.